definefinewine.blogspot.com — simple, straight forward reviews of wine, free of the standard fare that spoils most wine reviews. either you like a wine or not, it is as simple as that, n'est pas? i promise not to "define" what is a "fine wine". with reviews like "my love affair" and "the label sucks" it is bound to make you drink.
Monday, July 28, 2008
lot 79 is better (cameron hughes)
Cameron Hughes, Lot 79 2005 Merlot
Napa Valley
So the value proposition is this: There is an over supply each year of what CH calls "super premium" wine and "value" wine (over and under $14/bottle). You can read all the reasons why on chwine.com.
Honestly it all seems a bit like a bored MBA put this together - isn't wine making supposed to be an art? It just seems a little too much like a business-school case answer to the "wine glut" problem.
Anyway, so what they do is take the oversupply and keep the integrity of each lot by keeping it as is - not blending it to make it better as other winemakers do with this over supply. (Um, the whole fun of it, but whatever...)
IN ANY CASE,
Supposedly you're getting a super premium wine at a good value.
I had a different lot a few months ago (which I didn't like at ALL - can't remember which one), but lot 79 was definitely good. Lot 54 is from St. Emilion, so I'd definitely like to give that one a shot and see if I buy this whole concept.
Labels:
cameron hughes,
lot 79,
merlot,
napa,
red wine
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment